You are here
Western Priorities
Burgum struggles to defend Trump’s vanity projects, energy agenda
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum appeared in front of the House Natural Resources Committee yesterday to defend President Donald Trump’s 2027 Interior department budget request. Today’s hearing follows Burgum’s appearances in front of a House Appropriations subcommittee, a Senate appropriations subcommittee, and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last month.
At the hearing:
-
Burgum refused to acknowledge that the American people are facing high energy prices due to Trump’s actions in the Middle East and his vendetta against renewable energy, falling back on his tired talking point that “the sun doesn’t shine” at night.
-
Burgum struggled to defend Interior department spending on Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C., like painting the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue and constructing a White House ballroom.
-
Burgum pleaded ignorance when asked about the creation of Trump’s Freedom 250 group and corruption at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He also struggled to answer questions from Representatives Melanie Stansbury and Adelita Grijalva about massive proposed cuts to Bureau of Indian Affairs education programs.
“By refusing to take responsibility for his part in rising energy prices, Burgum is forsaking the American people in favor of fossil fuel executives,” Center for Western Priorities Executive Director Aaron Weiss said in a statement. “And in defending Trump’s vanity projects, Burgum is selling out national parks across the country to stroke President Trump’s ego.”
Quick hits Trump officials, billionaires, and the quiet reshaping of America’s public lands Burgum grilled over Trump vanity projects, proposed budget cuts, how batteries workThe New Republic | SFGATE | The Hill | Heatmap | Mother Jones | E&E News
Drones enter Montana corner-crossing debate BLM cancels bison grazing leases for American Prairie Forest Service is not reorganizing, it is ‘dismantling,’ says union Climate change starts a new clock on Colorado’s river runoff, study says Opinion: Grand Staircase-Escalante faces a new kind of threat in Congress Editorial: Tax on foreigners shortchanges parks Quote of the dayWe know public pressure works; it is up to us to apply it. This may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the anti-parks and anti-public lands caucus. The same can be said for those of us who want nothing more than to protect them.”
—Ryan Gellert, Patagonia, Salt Lake Tribune
Picture This @vallescalderaHow many of our followers have caught this view of Valles Caldera from Pajarito Mountain?
Pajarito Mountain, Cerro Grande, Rabbit Mountain, and other nearby peaks form the caldera rim, offering outstanding views into and across this 14-mile-wide, circular depression in the Earth.
Featured image: Doug Burgum at the House Natural Resources Committee on May 13, 2026
The post Burgum struggles to defend Trump’s vanity projects, energy agenda appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Burgum struggles to defend Trump’s DC vanity projects and ‘Energy Dominance’ agenda in House hearing
DENVER—Interior Secretary Doug Burgum appeared in front of the House Natural Resources Committee today to defend President Donald Trump’s 2027 Interior department budget request. Today’s hearing follows Burgum’s appearances in front of a House Appropriations subcommittee, a Senate appropriations subcommittee, and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last month.
At today’s hearing:
-
Burgum refused to acknowledge that the American people are facing high energy prices due to Trump’s actions in the Middle East and his vendetta against renewable energy. When asked by Representatives Dave Min and Seth Magaziner why the Interior department is slow-walking and cancelling renewable energy projects on public lands and waters while the country is facing an alleged “energy emergency,” Burgum fell back on his tired talking point that “the sun doesn’t shine” at night.
-
Burgum struggled to defend Interior department spending on Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C., like painting the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue and constructing a White House ballroom, in response to questioning from Representatives Joe Neguse, Maxine Dexter, and Ranking Member Jared Huffman.
-
When asked about no-bid contracts issued by the National Park Service for Trump’s vanity projects, Burgum pleaded ignorance, saying he wasn’t even familiar with the contractor hired to paint the reflecting pool blue. Burgum also pleaded ignorance when asked about the creation of Trump’s Freedom 250 group and corruption at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
-
Burgum also struggled to answer questions from Representatives Melanie Stansbury and Adelita Grijalva about massive proposed cuts to Bureau of Indian Affairs education programs.
The Center for Western Priorities released the following statement from Executive Director Aaron Weiss:
“You know something has gone off the rails when members of Congress have to hold up a battery to explain energy technology to the Interior secretary who also heads up the National Energy Dominance Council. In today’s hearing, Doug Burgum doubled down on his defense of President Trump’s failing energy policies and his ongoing spending spree on vanity projects in D.C. By refusing to take responsibility for his part in rising energy prices, Burgum is forsaking the American people in favor of fossil fuel executives. And in defending Trump’s vanity projects, Burgum is selling out national parks across the country to stroke President Trump’s ego.
“Doug Burgum also claimed ignorance when asked about corruption allegations at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service. If Burgum doesn’t know what’s going on under his own nose, he’s not doing his job. But we already knew that. He seems to spend more time on Fox News than he does in the office.”
Here is a full transcript of the hearing, as well as a folder with screenshots from the online hearing for media use.
Learn More:-
Highlight reel: The five most bewildering moments from Doug Burgum’s congressional hearings – Westwise
-
Burgum blunders through budget hearings, taking heat for NPS cuts and Trump ‘slush fund’ – Westwise
The post Burgum struggles to defend Trump’s DC vanity projects and ‘Energy Dominance’ agenda in House hearing appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
How Burgum is helping Trump gut national parks to fund vanity projects
President Donald Trump is using the National Park Service as a conduit to funnel money to his favorite construction firms and using Interior Secretary Doug Burgum as his bagman, as the duo spends excessive taxpayer money on Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C., while strangling the rest of the Park Service.
In a new Westwise blog post, Center for Western Priorities Communications Manager Kate Groetzinger highlights examples, including $17.4 million to restore two fountains at Lafayette Park that was projected to cost just $3.3 million in 2022, $13.1 million to paint the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool “American flag blue,” which Trump originally said would cost just $1.8 millon, and a request for a $10 billion “slush fund” seemingly designed to finance Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C.
Meanwhile, the president’s proposed 2027 budget asks for a staggering $757 million—or 26 percent—reduction in funding for the National Park System, which faces a $24 billion deferred maintenance backlog. Specifically, Trump and Burgum are also calling for a 44 percent reduction in the annual Park Service construction and major maintenance budget, leaving less than $50 million to address critical repairs at historic sites and parks nationwide.
The contrast between the administration’s treatment of the nation’s capital city and the rest of the country’s national parks is jarring and has sparked bipartisan outrage. As Groetzinger points out, “When infrastructure at national parks across the country begins to crumble as the ‘American flag blue’ reflecting pool turns green with algae, Doug Burgum will hold the blame as much as Donald Trump.”
Burgum is set to appear this morning before the House Natural Resources Committee to answer questions about Trump’s budget request for the Interior department.
Quick hits Report: Nevada’s lithium boom comes at the expense of Indigenous rights Colorado lawmakers have ‘deep concerns’ about federal government’s wildfire preparedness amid drought Interior staffers raise concerns about Reflecting Pool repairs Interior refuses to release documents related to Freedom 250, prompting lawsuit Program protecting wildlife migration expands across West Ted Turner owned vast swaths of Western land. What happens to them now? Editorial: U.S. Forest Service needs reform but Trump is looking to burn it down Opinion: A water doom loop is coming Quote of the dayThis is our land. We should have a say in what happens.”
—Fermina Stevens, Western Shoshone Defense Project, Grist
Picture This @elmalpaisnpsThe desert can be both beautiful and harsh. Its rugged, isolated beauty often reveals itself when you least expect it.
This banana yucca bloomed atop the Sandstone Bluffs Overlook—an incredible feat in a year when drought has pushed plants and animals to their limits.
Moments like this remind us how resilient life can be, even in the most unyielding places.
Featured image: Trump and Burgum appear at a press conference for the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool; Source: screenshot, LiveNow from Fox, May 7, 2026
The post How Burgum is helping Trump gut national parks to fund vanity projects appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Trump admin rescinds Public Lands Rule, loosens grazing regulations
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has published a final rule rescinding the Conservation and Landscape Health Rule, also known as the Public Lands Rule. The Public Lands Rule was finalized in May 2024 and clarified that conservation is a use of national public lands under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, which governs how the BLM lands are to be managed. After the rescission of the rule was proposed by the Trump administration in September 2025, an analysis by the Center for Western Priorities of the public comments on the proposal found that 98 percent of commenters opposed rescinding the rule.
“By rolling back the Public Lands Rule, the administration is admitting loudly and clearly that they think public lands are just there for corporations and for their donors to profit from,” said Tracy Stone-Manning, former director of the BLM during the Biden administration and now president of The Wilderness Society.
The BLM also announced proposed changes to its grazing regulations. If finalized, the changes would loosen requirements for ranchers and reduce public input. “These regulations are designed to further cut the public and scientists out of our public lands,” Center for Western Priorities Executive Director Aaron Weiss told E&E News. “Public lands belong to all of us, even when they’re being used for grazing.”
Quick hits BLM rescinds Public Lands Rule, proposes changes to grazing regsNew York Times | Associated Press | The Guardian | National Parks Traveler | Source NM | WyoFile | E&E News
Top Interior official ensnared in second major scandal Steve Pearce closer to confirmation as new head of Bureau of Land Management National Park Service rife with conflicts in Trump era Forest Service scrambles to justify research station closures, budget cuts Trump’s EPA seeks looser construction rules for gas plants, data centers, factoriesInside Climate News | E&E News
Lake Powell forecast to receive 13% of its usual flows, new report shows Opinion: Misusing the Congressional Review Act as a tool for land management policy Quote of the dayBy now, the administration’s playbook is clear – disregard the will of the American people, refuse to protect our public lands, hand control over to corporate polluters, then dispose of these landscapes entirely.”
—Athan Manuel, Sierra Club, WyoFile
Picture This @u.s.forestserviceAn early spring sunset illuminates the Ruby Mountains on the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada. Plan your visit today.
(Forest Service photo by Michael Balen.)
Featured image: Eagle Pass, BLM Wyoming
The post Trump admin rescinds Public Lands Rule, loosens grazing regulations appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Interior appointee admits conflict of interest on grazing policy
A top Trump appointee at the Interior department has acknowledged that she influenced policy that benefitted her family’s ranching operation. In previously-unreported remarks at a Congressioinal Western Caucus event last December, Karen Budd-Falen, associate deputy secretary at Interior, described grazing policy as part of her job and said that “the thing that was probably closest to my heart was grazing regulations.”
Karen Budd-Falen and her husband Frank Falen own at least five cattle or ranching operations valued at more than $1 million each, according to Budd-Falen’s financial disclosure forms. These companies collectively hold grazing allotments on more than a quarter-million acres of national public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, which is within the Interior department.
“The situation with Karen Budd-Falen seems to be quite brazen in the scheme of conflicts of interest,” Michelle Kuppersmith, executive director of the Campaign for Accountability, told the Washington Post. “She is, by her own admission, working on policy for grazing that will likely directly impact her own financial interests. And they’re not even trying to hide it.” Richard Painter, former chief Interior department ethics lawyer during the George W. Bush administration, agreed that holding grazing allotments while simultaneously overseeing Interior department grazing policy “would be a pretty slam-dunk financial conflict of interest.”
Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs’ Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is calling for a review of Trump administration actions that could have benefitted Budd-Falen and her family’s companies. As Blumenthal pointed out to the Washington Post, “You don’t have to be an expert on land management to know that when she talks about how policy changes are going to benefit ‘private landowners,’ she’s talking about herself.”
Quick hits Border wall plans cancelled for Big Bend National Park after backlash, Border Patrol commissioner claims Gas prices keep rising, but do big oil companies plan to drill more? Not so far Advocates raise concerns about proposal to allow chainsaw use in wilderness One of the West’s most remote national parks faces a troubled summer This summer, the American water crisis becomes real Lower Basin states announce temporary plan to save water from the Colorado River Plugging away at the millions of derelict oil and gas wells in the U.S. NM federal, local and tribal leaders celebrate legislation to protect the Caja del Rio Quote of the dayThe Caja del Rio is not acreage on a map. It is a place of memory, of identity, of ceremony, of recreation and refuge. Its future depends on our ability to embrace this shared responsibility, not just for ourselves, but for everyone who will come after us.”
—U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, Source NM
Picture This @whitesandsnpsWhat’s Bloomin’?
The beautiful Purple Sand Verbenas (Abronia angustifolia) are in full bloom here at the park. This hardy wildflower produces pale pink to purple flowers with white centers that bloom in clusters. Peak bloom in the park is from late April into May. The silvery appearance of the plants comes from sand grains sticking to its hairy leaves.
Despite being in a desert, White Sands National Park has a wide variety of plant life. The Purple Sand Verbena is just one plant that has adapted to harsh desert living.
As always, when checking out the flowers in the park, please be sure to take only pictures and leave the plants there for others to enjoy!
– Ranger Paige
Featured image: Cattle grazing on national public lands near the Nevada-Oregon border, BLM Oregon and Washington
The post Interior appointee admits conflict of interest on grazing policy appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Interior bypasses court injunction at behest of oil donor
Emails obtained by Public Domain and Fieldnotes show the Interior department worked closely with Continental Resources to secure drilling permits in Converse County, Wyoming, despite a court injunction restricting new drilling on public land there. Continental Resources supplied the Bureau of Land Management with a playbook to bypass environmental restrictions meant to protect the county’s groundwater, and the BLM has since rushed to issue over 70 permits to Continental using the loophole.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum received $250,000 in campaign donations from Continental Resources, which is controlled by billionaire oil tycoon Harold Hamm, when he ran for president in 2023. Burgum has also received around $50,000 in oil royalties from land he leased to Hamm’s company.
“This reminds me of the days of the Bush-Cheney administration’s massive push to drill the West, when it was obvious that the oil industry was calling the shots when it came to public land management,” Erik Molvar, executive director of Western Watersheds Project, told Public Domain. “But we never had such direct and obvious proof that oil corporations were giving the orders, and BLM officials at the highest levels were obediently carrying them out.”
CWP says goodbye to executive directorIn the latest episode of the Center for Western Priorities’ podcast, The Landscape, we say goodbye to former Executive Director Jennifer Rokala. In a conversation with the entire CWP team, Jen reflects on the highs and lows of leading CWP for 11 years, what she’s most proud of, and what gives her hope for the future of America’s public lands. Listen now wherever you get podcasts or watch on YouTube.
Quick hits How many federal public lands jobs did the Mountain West lose? Congressman seeks probe of $11 million no-bid contract for Park Service fountain revamp Opinion: Pikes Peak region’s outdoors future depends on LWCF funding Navajo Nation residents push back on possible copper mine How controlled burns can help save taxpayers billions This fight unfolding in southern Utah could have implications for states trying to take over federal lands Shared ground: Coalition forms to promote affordable housing on public lands Wildfire is an increasing threat to the West’s recreation economy, according to new research Quote of the dayProposed budget cuts and growing bureaucratic obstacles are threatening to slow or stop LWCF-funded projects across the country… Whatever your politics, that should concern you. LWCF has never been a partisan program. It was built on a bipartisan foundation and has delivered results under presidents and Congresses of both parties for 60 years.”
—David Leinweber, founder of Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance, Colorado Sun
Picture ThisBig Stone National Wildlife Refuge offers a chance to unplug from the stresses of daily life and reconnect with Minnesota’s tallgrass prairie.
Photos by Mike Budd / USFWS
Feature image: Interior Secretary Doug Burgum (left) and oil tycoon Harold Hamm (right); Source: Burgum photo by Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia, Hamm photo by david_shankbone via Flickr
The post Interior bypasses court injunction at behest of oil donor appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Jennifer Rokala on 11 years fighting for public lands at CWP
In this special episode of The Landscape, the entire Center for Western Priorities team joins us for an interview with Jennifer Rokala, CWP’s outgoing executive director, to celebrate her 11 years leading the organization. Jen reflects on key victories throughout her tenure at CWP, the organization’s evolution as a communications-driven conservation hub, and her advice for Aaron as he steps into the role of executive director.
Plus, the team talks about the best food in the West. Here are the restaurants mentioned during this episode:
- Hot Tomato Pizza – Fruita, Colorado
- Bin 707 – Grand Junction, Colorado
- Eegee’s – Tucson, Arizona
- Taco Party – Grand Junction, Colorado
- Rome Station – Rome, Oregon
- BirdHouse – Page, Arizona
- Emails Show How Interior Dept Delivered New Drilling Permits for Burgum’s Billionaire Ally — Public Domain
- Shared ground: Coalition forms to promote affordable housing on public lands — Deseret News
- Solar ranch aims to prove grazing cattle under the panels is a farmland win-win — Los Angeles Times
- Housing and conservation experts agree: Public lands can’t solve the housing crisis. Here’s what can — Center for Western Priorities via Substack
- Watch this episode on YouTube
Produced by Aaron Weiss, Lauren Bogard, Kate Groetzinger, and Lilly Bock-Brownstein
Feedback: podcast@westernpriorities.org
Music: Purple Planet
Featured image: Center for Western Priorities team
The post Jennifer Rokala on 11 years fighting for public lands at CWP appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Trump administration orders rapid end to some hunting rules on federal lands
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum has directed national recreation areas, seashores, wildlife refuges, and other public lands to immediately lift dozens of restrictions on hunting and trapping, according to internal documents reviewed by the New York Times.
The directive, which takes effect this week, targets rules at 76 Interior sites that allowed hunting but had restrictions designed to protect habitats or public safety, such as prohibitions on firing weapons across trails or cleaning game in public restrooms. Burgum ordered the changes in an April 21 memo, asserting that any restrictions not strictly required by law must be the “minimum necessary for public safety or resource protection.”
The Interior department framed the move as a way to expand access for sportsmen and women, but critics are concerned that the administration is bypassing environmental studies and public consultation to implement major rule changes, and warned against a “one size fits all” approach to land management. “What we’re really concerned about is, that memo didn’t say, ‘do analysis,'” said Stephanie Adams of the National Parks Conservation Association. “It didn’t say ‘engage the public,’ and it didn’t say to be sure to focus on that key part of the Organic Act, which is to manage in a way that leaves the parks unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”
Senator Ben Ray Luján: Reform the 154-year-old mining lawIn a letter to the editor in the Washington Post, New Mexico Senator Ben Ray Luján calls for an overhaul of the General Mining Act of 1872, arguing the law prioritizes industry over the safety of community drinking water. In a response to claims that permitting takes decades, Luján notes that the most delayed projects were due to the current law causing opposition and distrust with local communities and Tribal nations.
Quick hits Bison have grazed these lands for centuries. Trump wants to evict them June lease sale will offer over 150,000 acres in Colorado These rural towns are banking on outdoor recreation to boost their economies Trump administration falls behind on wildfire prevention with risky fire season ahead How the rush to mine the metal of the future echoes America’s colonial past Editorial: New tactic to come after public lands must be stopped Twin Metals paid former Trump officials $380K. Their Boundary Waters mine is now advancing against public opinion 8 victories that give hope in the fight to protect public lands Quote of the dayAt a certain point, operating these mines and establishing these settlements stopped being about pure capitalism, pure greed, and it started to be about harming Indians. The wealth accumulated from all that extraction was a self-awarded prize for harming Indians, which was at the time, and possibly still is, the most American patriotic thing.”
—Lakota Sioux member Taylor Gunhammer, Inside Climate News
Picture This @yellowstonenps“That’s no moon.” Actually, it is. We had a beautiful moonset this morning over Terrace Mountain in Mammoth Hot Springs. May the 4th be with you!
Featured photo: Mesa Trail at Curecanti National Recreation Area. mlhradio, CC BY-NC 2.0
The post Trump administration orders rapid end to some hunting rules on federal lands appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
The Trump administration is erasing history on national park websites
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum is ordering the removal of science and history materials from National Park Service websites in addition to visitor centers and physical signs. Reporting from E&E News found that a small group of Interior department employees has been reviewing new submissions for the National Park Service’s 180,000 websites since February, evaluating the material for compliance with President Donald Trump’s “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History” directive and Burgum’s corresponding secretarial order.
Previously, park service employees had a lot of authority over the content on park websites, and park-based staff typically led decisions about website content, often in consultation with Tribes and local communities. “The Park Service has been for most — if not almost all — of its history very decentralized, with a lot of authority, including comms at the park level,” said Jonathan Jarvis, who was National Park Service director during the Obama administration. “This is a very divergent approach.”
This process is already altering how history is told online. For example, an article written by a Tribal group for the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail website removed references to Thomas Jefferson fathering children with an enslaved woman, Sally Hemings, before it was allowed to be posted.
The website crackdown follows the recent removal of physical signs and exhibits at parks, including a sign at Grand Teton National Park acknowledging a massacre of at least 173 Piegan Blackfeet, and at Muir Woods National Monument, where signs mentioning the contributions of Indigenous people and women have been removed.
The five most bewildering moments from Doug Burgum’s congressional hearingsA new Westwise blog post captures some of the most embarrassing and perplexing exchanges from Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s recent appearance before the House Interior Appropriations subcommittee. The blog post highlights Secretary Burgum’s attempt to defend a $10 billion slush fund for D.C. vanity projects despite slashing the National Park Service budget, his sudden concern for whales after voting to condemn a whale species to extinction, and more.
Quick hits How many federal land agency jobs were lost in the West? House members file brief in case aiming to remove Trump’s face from park pass Protesters in Fargo target BurgumInForum | KVRR | Prairie News | KFGO
Tohono O’odham leaders voice opposition to physical border wall after construction damages 1,000-year-old site Opinion: The public’s lands deserve better than Steve Pearce Trump gives go-ahead to major new Canada-US oil pipeline International visitor fee has national park gateway business owners in distress BLM investigates copper line removal near Wyoming sage grouse leks, historic trails Quote of the dayThis notion of needing to restore truth and sanity to American history is one of the largest red herrings in American history. It’s trying to resolve a problem that doesn’t really exist, that never really existed.”
—Alan Spears, senior director at the National Parks Conservation Association, CNN
Picture This@usinteriorLocated in southern New Mexico, @whitesandsnps offers a landscape like no other, with glistening gypsum dunes perfect for exploration, play, and inspiration. Whether you’re hiking to a sweeping vista, sledding with family or soaking in the quiet beauty of the desert, unforgettable moments await.
Photos by Stephen Leonardi | @leo_visions_ and Rick Kramer
Featured photo: National Park Service badge and patch, NPS/Kurt Moses
The post The Trump administration is erasing history on national park websites appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Highlight reel: The five most bewildering moments from Doug Burgum’s congressional hearings
When Doug Burgum appeared before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee as President Donald Trump’s nominee to head the Interior department last year, he was extended the traditional benefit of the doubt, with senators chummily reminiscing about North Dakota, lobbing softballs, and avoiding tough questions on the way to voting to confirm Burgum as Interior secretary. If Burgum got the idea that this is how all hearings would go, he was mistaken. A year later, as the Interior secretary who has overseen a multi-pronged effort to dismantle the agency and sell off or sell out our national public lands, Burgum seemed totally unprepared to handle difficult questions from members of Congress, not to mention the decidedly different vibe of a budget hearing where elected representatives demanded accountability for how their constituents’ resources are being stewarded and tax dollars are being spent.
In appearances before three congressional committees so far, Burgum struggled to defend President Trump’s proposed Interior department budget and explain the administration’s chaotic, destructive, and unpopular agenda for America’s public lands. Below are five of the most head-scratching exchanges between Burgum and lawmakers—along with some useful information Secretary Burgum might want to bookmark for his next Hill appearance.
Burgum can’t provide details on the $10 billion request for ‘beautification’ in Washington, D.C.President Trump’s budget proposal includes a $10 billion request for a new Presidential Capital Stewardship Program which would “carry out priority construction and rehabilitation projects in the Washington, D.C. area.” According to the Interior department’s own website, the deferred maintenance backlog for Washington, D.C. is just over $2 billion. When asked by Senator Angus King of Maine what the extra $8 billion is for, Burgum’s bumbling explanation was that “D.C. is like a state. It’s not just, like, the National Mall. It’s for the greater capital region. That’s a region.” But again, according to the Interior department, adding in the deferred maintenance backlog for the entire states of Maryland and Virginia—far beyond the D.C. area— would bring the total to $4 billion, still leaving more than half of Burgum’s $10 billion request unaccounted for. Meanwhile, last year’s budget for the entire National Park Service was just $4.6 billion.
During the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Senator Jeff Merkeley of Oregon also asked about the $10 billion request for the Presidential Capital Stewardship Program and if Burgum could provide a specific list of what the funds would be used for, as required by law. Burgum said he would “get you all the information you need according to law” but stopped short of agreeing to provide a detailed list. “As long as we don’t have the details, it’s a slush fund,” Merkeley responded. “You can call it something else if you want.”
Burgum learns about batteries and fossil fuel subsidiesBurgum struggled to hold his own against the expertise of Senator King—a former energy executive—on energy issues. In response to questions from King about the Trump administration’s actions to block renewable energy projects, Burgum fell back on a well-worn intermittency argument. “We have no ability to dispatch wind and solar,” Burgum claimed, and followed up with, “There are times in North Dakota when the wind does not blow and the sun does not shine.” But King pointed out, “That’s where batteries and storage come in.” Burgum argued that worldwide battery storage would only provide one hour’s worth of energy. However, in the United States where Burgum is Interior secretary, battery storage has been increasing rapidly, with a new record set in 2025 for energy storage installations, and is expected to reach at least 600 gigawatt hours of installed energy storage by 2030. This is the equivalent of 300 Hoover Dams, according to the Department of Energy, which offers other comparisons Burgum may find helpful. In California, 44 percent of evening peak energy is now being delivered via batteries.
Burgum also complained that he doesn’t understand “why we had to have massive taxpayer subsidies to produce” renewable energy. King pointed out that the U.S. currently pays $30 billion in subsidies to the oil and gas industry. The International Monetary Fund put this figure at $3 billion in explicit subsidies in 2022 alone, with an additional $754 billion in implicit subsidies. A 2025 analysis found that even without taxpayer subsidies, renewable energy sources are still the most cost-effective source of energy.
Burgum defends 24 percent of National Park Service staff coincidentally choosing to quit at the exact same timeSenator Patty Murray of Washington pressed Burgum about unacceptable cuts to on-the-ground staff at national parks in Washington and a budget that proposes to eliminate even more park staff. Arguing with the characterization that staff had been “forced out,” Burgum insisted, “There’s been no forcing of anything. These are all voluntary.” Murray wasn’t buying it: “However you want to put it, a quarter of them left over the last 15 months.” According to the National Parks Conservation Association, 4,000 staff, nearly 25 percent of the National Park Service workforce, left their jobs since January 2025 as a result of “pressured resignations and early retirements” along with hiring freezes that prevented vacancies from being filled. That’s an awful lot of people who somehow all voluntarily left their jobs at the same time.
Burgum, who voted to condemn the Rice’s whale to extinction, worries about the impact of wind turbine installation on whale populationsIn response to questions from Representative Chellie Pingree of Maine, Burgum complained about the impacts to whales and other marine life from pounding pylons into the sea floor to install offshore wind turbines. Pingree immediately pointed out the disconnect between Burgum’s sudden whale-based arguments against offshore wind and his vote to remove Endangered Species Act protections for the endangered Rice’s whale in order to clear the way for more offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico: “If you’re going to be talking about pounding and those kinds of things, then we can’t have offshore drilling, and you want to re-permit the entire East Coast for offshore drilling. If you want to talk about danger to marine mammals and danger to fisheries, my next question is going to be about what happened with Deepwater Horizon, and you want to reduce the permitting standards there. There’s just a lot of hypocrisy in your arguments.”
Burgum denies erasure of history on national park signsBurgum awkwardly tried to dodge a question from Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii about the removal of exhibits about slavery at the President’s House site in Philadelphia and other actions to erase history from national park sites across the country.
“Some of these examples that are floating around in the media saying some of these things have been removed, they haven’t been removed. In the case of Philadelphia, there’s a weird injunction where we can’t put the new signage up. And what is on the new signage, which is not hiding any points of our history, is available for anyone to read.”
Burgum referred Hirono to the President’s House Site website, where images of new panels—including information about slavery—are indeed available to view online. New physical panels at the site itself, however, are not yet in place, depriving visitors of the opportunity to learn from these interpretive materials in context during their time at the site.
Hirono also asked Burgum about the removal of signs referring to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Burgum responded, “I don’t believe that any of that information has been removed.” However, signage related to slavery and the internment of Japanese Americans, was removed from signs at Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge in New York City following an executive order signed by President Trump in March 2025 ordering the removal of materials that contain “improper partisan ideology.”
The post Highlight reel: The five most bewildering moments from Doug Burgum’s congressional hearings appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Borderlands part 2: The fight against a border wall at Big Bend
In the second part of our series on the borderlands, Aaron and Lilly are joined by Bob Krumenaker, former superintendent of Big Bend National Park and current chair of Keep Big Bend Wild. They discuss the proposal for a border wall through one of America’s national treasures, the bipartisan coalition rallying to stop it, and what’s at stake for the park, communities, and local economy. Plus, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum struggles to defend a 38% cut to the National Park Service maintenance budget while making a $10 billion request for D.C.-based projects.
News- Fact Check: Burgum claims $10 billion Trump slush fund request is for NPS deferred maintenance only — Center for Western Priorities
- Senate ENR committee tussles with Burgum over permitting — E&E News
- Trump used Park Service to funnel millions to ballroom construction firm — New York Times
- President’s Budget Proposal Slashes National Park Service Funding Amid Ongoing Attacks on National Parks — National Parks Conservation Association
- Border wall map disappears from government website — Big Bend Sentinel
- Land acquisition expands popular Jeffco park adjacent to Red Rocks — Denver Post
- Borderlands part 1: The threats to public lands at the border
- Keep Big Bend Wild
- Mission Creep: How Trump is using the border to militarize our public lands — Westwise blog
- Watch this episode on YouTube
Produced by Aaron Weiss, Lauren Bogard, and Lilly Bock-Brownstein
Feedback: podcast@westernpriorities.org
Music: Purple Planet
Featured image: U.S.-Mexico border within Big Bend National Park, NPS photo
The post Borderlands part 2: The fight against a border wall at Big Bend appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Fact Check: Burgum claims $10 billion Trump slush fund request is for NPS deferred maintenance only
DENVER—Interior Secretary Doug Burgum claimed in a Senate Energy and Natural Resources hearing this morning that President Donald Trump’s $10 billion “slush fund” request in his 2027 proposed Interior department budget is solely for deferred maintenance at National Park Service sites in and around Washington, D.C., and will not go toward any new construction. See their exchange HERE.
Trump’s proposed NPS budget requests the establishment of a “new $10.0 billion Presidential Capital Stewardship Program in order to carry out priority construction and rehabilitation projects in the Washington, D.C. area.”
But the Interior department estimates the NPS deferred maintenance backlog in D.C. to be just over $2 billion. Adding in the maintenance backlog for all of Virginia and Maryland brings the total to only $4 billion, leaving $6 billion or more unaccounted for in Burgum’s request for Trump’s slush fund.
Trump’s NPS budget also calls for a 55 percent reduction in the annual National Park Service construction and major maintenance budget, leaving NPS less than $50 million to address repairs at historic sites and national parks across the country, and a 53 percent, or $213 million, reduction in resource stewardship funds.
The Center for Western Priorities released the following statement from Communications Manager Kate Groetzinger:
“Doug Burgum finally gave Congress insight into the shady $10 billion request for ‘beautification’ projects in Washington D.C. But his answer doesn’t square with his own department’s deferred maintenance numbers. He’s already spent $17 million in taxpayer money on a fountain across from the White House. President Trump has made it clear he wants more vanity projects, from giant arches to sculpture gardens, in his own backyard.
“It’s time for Secretary Burgum to tell President Trump that all of America’s parks need attention, not just the ones outside the president’s window.”
Learn more:-
Burgum blunders through budget hearings, taking heat for NPS cuts and Trump ‘slush fund’ – Westwise
-
DOI Deferred Maintenance backlog – Interior Department
- Firm Building Trump’s Ballroom Got a Secret No-Bid Contract for a Nearby Job – New York Times
The post Fact Check: Burgum claims $10 billion Trump slush fund request is for NPS deferred maintenance only appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
States can’t keep up with rising wildfire costs
Western states are running out of money to fight wildfires, according to reporting in High Country News. As climate change fuels hotter fires that occur year-round, states routinely spend well over their forecasted wildfire budgets. For example, Oregon spent more than $350 million fighting wildfires in 2024, far exceeding the $10 million it had allocated for wildfire that year.
A 2022 analysis by Pew Charitable Trusts found that most states use their general fund, or revenue from state taxes and other fees, to cover wildland fire costs, pitting firefighting and fire prevention efforts against top state priorities. Skyrocketing suppression costs have also led to a reduction in fire mitigation treatments, like prescribed burns and mechanical thinning, increasing wildfire risk on state forest land and pouring metaphorical fuel on the wildfire cycle.
Some states are tackling this issue with new taxes or wildfire-specific accounts. Oregon passed a new nicotine tax to fund wildfire prevention last year, and Utah put $150 million into a new wildfire fund. Still, costs continue to rise, and drought is driving above-average wildfire predictions for the West this summer.
Burgum struggles to defend public lands budgetInterior Secretary Doug Burgum struggled to defend the Trump administration’s disastrous public lands agenda in congressional appropriations subcommittee hearings p;last week in both the House and the Senate. Members grilled him on cuts to the National Park Service, a billion-dollar payout to kill offshore wind energy, and a $10 billion request for a NPS “beautification” program in D.C. Read more in a new Westwise blog post by CWP Communications Manager Kate Groetzinger.
Burgum appears before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee this morning.
Quick hits The ramifications of record-shattering heat on the West’s ecosystems How the Lolo National Forest planners are bracing for a roadless rule repeal Trump signs bill ending protections for Boundary Waters watershed University of Utah creates critical minerals institute Energy execs push WY lawmakers to carry out Trump’s “energy dominance” agenda Colorado farmers tighten their belts ahead of summer drought NM breaks ground on Reforestation Center, with plans to plant 5 million seedlings a year Rep. Davids introduces Truth in National Parks Act to protect Native American history Quote of the dayWhat we’re seeing right now is a deliberate attempt to erase the experiences of Native communities and other marginalized groups from places that are supposed to educate and inform the public. That’s unacceptable.”
—U.S. Representative Sharice Davids, Native News Online
Picture ThisCalifornia’s ocean is not a sacrifice zone for Big Oil.
With Donald Trump plotting to sell off our beaches to his fossil fuel industry donors, we’re celebrating California Ocean Day by reaffirming our commitment to protect every inch of it.
Feature image: A prescribed burn in Oregon on Bureau of Land Management land in 2016; Source: Justin Robinson for the BLM via Flickr
The post States can’t keep up with rising wildfire costs appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Borderlands part 1: The threats to public lands at the border
- Pearce on a list of candidates Senate hopes to confirm soon — E&E News
- Trump Just Withdrew Scott Socha to Lead the National Park Service — SFGate
- White House completes review of BLM public lands rule — E&E News
- Trump used Park Service to funnel millions to ballroom construction firm — New York Times
- President’s Budget Proposal Slashes National Park Service Funding Amid Ongoing Attacks on National Parks — National Parks Conservation Association
- Border wall map disappears from government website — Big Bend Sentinel
- Find Laiken Jordahl on X, Bluesky, Threads, TikTok, and Instagram
- Center for Biological Diversity
- No Big Bend Wall
- Mission Creep: How Trump is using the border to militarize our public lands — Westwise blog
- Watch this episode on YouTube
Produced by Aaron Weiss, Kate Groetzinger, Lauren Bogard, and Lilly Bock-Brownstein
Feedback: podcast@westernpriorities.org
Music: Purple Planet
Featured image: San Rafael Valley border wall construction. Russ McSpadden, Center for Biological Diversity
The post Borderlands part 1: The threats to public lands at the border appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.




