Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

Last week we asked you to take action to protect the Labyrinth Canyon area from a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposal to authorize the Keg Knoll backcountry airstrip for private aircraft takeoffs and landings. Now, the BLM’s Canyon Country District is proposing to designate ten additional backcountry airstrips in the Moab and Monticello areas and authorize periodic machine maintenance in remote locations. Once again, we need your help to keep these quiet, wild places free of aircraft noise and mechanical intrusions.

These airstrips, most of which show no signs of recent use, are scattered across some of the most remote and ecologically sensitive landscapes in southern Utah—including the Gemini Bridges/Labyrinth Canyon area and the remote backcountry immediately adjacent to Bears Ears National Monument.

Please tell the BLM to protect wilderness-quality lands, wildlife habitat, and Bears Ears National Monument by rejecting six of the ten proposed airstrips: Spring Canyon, Big Flat, Castle Creek, Nokai Dome, Piute, and Red Canyon.

 
Click image to enlarge

None of these airstrips have ever been officially designated, and despite past use, many of these locations are essentially reclaimed and no longer functional for takeoff or landing. Reopening them would require removal of mature native plants like blackbrush, rabbitbrush, and junipers, fragmenting habitat and degrading wilderness characteristics that took years to recover. Several locations sit within BLM-identified wilderness-quality lands or directly adjacent to Bears Ears National Monument, where aircraft noise and visual intrusions would diminish the solitude, natural soundscapes, and cultural landscapes these areas were meant to protect.

The Spring Canyon and Big Flat airstrips lie within bighorn habitat along the Green River corridor and near Canyonlands National Park—the same landscape where the BLM already restricts other recreation activities to protect these important species during lambing season. Similarly, raptors nesting near Big Flat, Nokai Dome, and other sites are highly sensitive to aviation noise, which discourages use of otherwise suitable nesting habitat.

Click here to urge the BLM to reject designation of the most sensitive airstrip locations.

These remote canyon country landscapes deserve protection, not rubber-stamping of aircraft use that degrades recovering ecosystems and introduces chronic noise into some of Utah’s last remaining quiet, wild places. The BLM has decided not to open a formal public comment period on this action, so please submit your comments as soon as possible to ensure they’re taken into account.

Thank you for your support!

P.S. If you haven’t taken action yet on the Keg Knoll backcountry airstrip, please click here to submit a separate comment to the BLM’s Price field office.

The post Tell BLM: No More Airstrips in Utah’s Wild Places! appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

May 7, 2026 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SUWA Statement on BLM’s Intent to Expand Destructive Motorized Use in the San Rafael Swell and San Rafael Desert – 5.7.26  Proposal would damage cultural sites, wildlife habitat, and non-motorized visitors at the behest of Utah politicians and extreme off-road vehicle groups

Contacts:
Grant Stevens, Communications Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA); (319) 427-0260; grant@suwa.org

Washington, DC – Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced that it would be reconsidering the San Rafael Desert and San Rafael Swell Travel Management Plans. Those two plans were finalized in 2022 and 2025, respectively, and guide where motorized vehicle use is allowed across more than 1.5 million acres of BLM-managed lands in central Utah’s redrock country.  Those plans designated hundreds of miles of new motorized vehicle routes and authorized public motorized use on them. Now the Trump Administration’s BLM plans to go even further, increasing motorized recreation at the expense of all other public lands users. Below is a statement from SUWA Staff Attorney Laura Peterson and additional information.  

“This is yet another naked political decision to appease radical off-road vehicle groups and Utah politicians. Their vision for public lands in Utah is one where landscapes are blanketed by off-road vehicle routes, transforming quiet, wild places into motorized playgrounds and ignoring significant damage to cultural sites, desert waterways, and wildlife habitat,” said Laura Peterson, Staff Attorney with the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA). “The San Rafael Swell and Desert are beloved southern Utah redrock landscapes with endless opportunities for hiking, camping and spending time with family and friends. These areas should be known for their stunning vistas, cultural sites and opportunities for solitude, not off-road vehicle damage.” 

The San Rafael Swell: 

The San Rafael Swell Travel Management Area (TMA) encompasses roughly 1,150,000 acres of BLM-managed lands within the Price and Richfield field offices. A much-loved backcountry area, the Swell is home to irreplaceable cultural and historic resources, important wildlife habitat, and outstanding recreation opportunities. The Swell’s sinuous slot canyons, soaring red rock cliffs, and prominent buttes provide countless opportunities for hikers, canyoneers, campers, river runners, climbers, bikers, photographers, and other visitors. This TMA also encompasses designated wilderness areas and the San Rafael Swell Recreation Area.  

In December 2024, the BLM released the final San Rafael Swell Travel Management Plan. Rather than selecting an alternative that would have balanced motorized recreation and non-motorized recreation while also minimizing damage to natural and cultural resources, the agency chose an alternative that prioritized motorized vehicle use. The plan designated nearly 1,500 miles of routes and opened a substantial number of new routes to motorized vehicle use. While the BLM’s plan got many things wrong, one thing it did right was not opening roughly 650 miles of trails in places like stream corridors and wash bottoms, cultural sites and where use would lead to serious documented environmental damage. It also included “routes” that are simply lines on a map that do not exist on the ground.  

Despite a plan that expanded ORV use in the Swell, the Idaho-based BlueRibbon Coalition and others sued the BLM in March 2025 alleging the agency did not go far enough. The group sought a preliminary injunction to stop the BLM from implementing the San Rafael Swell plan. The court has not granted the preliminary injunction. The case has been stayed at the request of the Trump Administration.  

The San Rafael Desert: 

The San Rafael Desert Travel Management Area (TMA) encompasses more than 375,000 acres of sublime Utah backcountry, including the designated Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness and wilderness-quality lands such as Sweetwater Reef and the San Rafael River. It features stunning redrock canyons, important cultural sites, and an outstanding diversity of native bee species, many found nowhere else but this corner of Utah.  

In the last few months of the first Trump Administration, the BLM approved a destructive travel management plan that—by the agency’s own account—emphasized maximum mileage available for off-road vehicle recreation and more than doubled the miles of dirt two-tracks and trails for motorized use from 300 miles to more than 765 miles. SUWA challenged that unbalanced plan in federal court. SUWA and the BLM ultimately settled that lawsuit in February of 2022 and the BLM agreed to reconsider the designation of certain routes. The BLM eventually took corrective action and revised the San Rafael Desert TMP to close 120 miles of erroneously designated routes – routes the BLM acknowledged were reclaimed, redundant or non-existent on the ground and with no public purpose or need.  

In 2024, the state of Utah and others challenged BLM’s San Rafael reconsideration decision in federal court. That case has been stayed for over a year. 

Travel Management Plans:  

The San Rafael Swell and San Rafael Desert Travel Management Plans are two of 11 travel plans the BLM is completing as part of a court-supervised settlement agreement between the agency, conservation, and ORV groups. Covering more than 6 million acres of BLM-managed lands in eastern and southern Utah, these plans will determine where motorized vehicles will be allowed on some of Utah’s wildest public lands. Including this plan, the BLM has completed five of the 11 plans. Read more about SUWA’s litigation to ensure these travel plans follow federal laws to protect public lands and resources. 

### 
The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is a nonprofit organization with members and supporters from around the country dedicated to protecting America’s redrock wilderness. From offices in Moab, Salt Lake City, and Washington, DC, our team of professionals defends the redrock, organizes support for America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act, and stewards a world-renowned landscape. Learn more at www.suwa.org. 

 

The post SUWA Statement on BLM’s Intent to Expand Destructive Motorized Use in the San Rafael Swell and San Rafael Desert – 5.7.26  appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

April 29, 2026

Unprecedented Alliance Highlights Need for Real Affordable Housing Solutions Without Sacrificing Public Lands – 4.29.26  Leaders of the Affordable Housing and Public Lands Community unveil “Shared Ground” affirming that protecting public lands and expanding affordable housing are complementary, not competing, priorities.

Contacts:
Grant Stevens, Communications Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA), grant@suwa.org, 319-427-0260
Ben Finzel, RENEWPR, ben@renewpr.com, 202-277-6286
Annette Larkin, RENEWPR, annette@renewpr.com, 703-772-6427

Washington, DC – Leaders from the affordable housing and public lands communities today unveiled a joint principles framework rejecting the fallacy that selling off America’s public lands is a solution to the housing affordability crisis, while highlighting the need for real, equitable housing solutions.

Shared Ground: Aligning Affordable Housing & Public Lands Priorities is a policy framework endorsed by a broad coalition of national, regional, and local organizations. The effort underscores that protecting public lands and expanding access to affordable housing are complementary, not competing priorities. Shared Ground brings together leaders from both communities to advance real solutions, reject false tradeoffs, and promote policies that engage local communities and support strong, livable communities nationwide.

This partnership comes amid escalating pressures on both issues, including continued underinvestment in federal housing programs, increasing proposals to sell or transfer public lands without public benefit, and growing bipartisan frustration with ineffective, politically driven solutions.

The joint framework outlines key principles to guide policy decisions:

• Rejecting mass public land selloffs as a housing solution
• Prioritizing proven strategies, including increased funding, zoning reform, and community-based development
• Ensuring any use of public land for housing is limited, targeted, and includes enforceable affordability requirements
• Protecting public lands as shared resources that support recreation, local economies, and community well-being

The principles are endorsed by a diverse coalition of housing advocates, conservation groups, and community-based organizations nationwide—reflecting the shared stakes and urgency of this issue.

Learn more about Shared Ground and read the principles here. 

Quotes from participating organizations below:

“The affordable housing crisis is serious but placing the blame on public lands will not solve it. Instead of focusing on actual solutions, shortsighted politicians keep pushing public lands sell off under the guise of affordable housing as they simultaneously cut effective and proven housing programs. There’s no need for a false choice: we can keep and protect public lands while also investing in creative housing solutions.” Neal Clark, Wildlands Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 

“Protecting our public lands and ensuring every American has a safe, affordable place to call home are complementary goals. We must reject the false choice between conservation and housing. Any use of public land must come with legally enforceable requirements to ensure it serves the public interest, providing permanent affordability and equitable access for local communities.” – Donald Whitehead, Executive Director, National Coalition for the Homeless

“Americans love public lands and the freedom they provide to hunt, fish and hike—and we want them to stay as they are, public and accessible, for future generations. Backed by more than 60 organizations, these principles reject the false choice the administration is trying to force between protecting these places and addressing the housing crisis. Americans deserve real solutions on both.” – Tracy Stone-Manning, President, The Wilderness Society

“National Low Income Housing Coalition’s (NLIHC) research finds a gap between wages and rental housing costs in the U.S. Affordable rental homes are out of reach for millions of low-wage workers, seniors, families, and other renters. Governments often turn to public lands to build affordable housing in an effort to safely house residents amid shortages. These efforts are viable but must align with responsible public lands stewardship. NLIHC joins our partners in environmental and conservation spaces in opposing the mass sell-off of federal land without key guardrails or affordability requirements. Many proven solutions exist to increase housing affordability without sacrificing public lands, including preserving existing affordable housing. We encourage policymakers to adopt balanced solutions to the affordable housing crisis that advance long-term affordability and protect irreplaceable natural and cultural resources while safeguarding America’s public lands.” – Renee M. Willis, President and CEO, NLIHC

“The housing crisis demands urgent, evidence-based action, not the short-sighted liquidation of the country’s remaining natural and wild landscapes. This framework looks beyond political ideologies and prioritizes proven strategies to ensure that any use of public land is strictly targeted, limited, and bound by enforceable affordability requirements. It recognizes the reality that most of these public lands lack the infrastructure and accessibility required for viable development, and their true value lies in the clean water, recreation, and economic stability they provide to our communities.” – Chris Hill, CEO, Conservation Lands Foundation

“Land is necessary to the development of affordable housing and local governments should look to well-located surplus lands as a resource for building housing. However, preserving public land for conservation and recreation is a critical priority for our country. Current federal proposals to sell off public land are thinly veiled attempts to line the pockets of politicians’ friends and to undermine public parks, public forests and other public lands. The National Housing Law Project is pleased to release this framework that advances our shared interests in preserving public lands and making housing more affordable.” – Shamus Roller, Chief Executive Officer, National Housing Law Project

“Veterans and military families understand that strong communities require both stable housing and protected public lands. We have seen how these resources support local economies, create jobs, and improve quality of life for the people who live there. We can and should pursue practical solutions that expand housing while keeping public lands in public hands.” – Janessa Goldbeck, CEO, Vet Voice Foundation

“A powerful model during a particularly challenging time – public interest advocates from different sectors coming together to both affirm our shared values and to commit to finding ways to mutually support real solutions to expand affordable housing and to preserve the American birthright of public lands ownership. We stand together to reject the transparent attempt by cynical politicians in DC to divide us through false choices.”-  Mark Allison, Executive Director, New Mexico Wild and former Chair of the Board, National Low Income Housing Coalition

“Solving one crisis doesn’t mean creating another. The national housing crisis should not be used as a stalking horse to sell off our public lands to private developers and industry. Our communities thrive when they have both abundant housing and abundant access to the nature that unites us. Sierra Club supports the common-sense policies that increase our country’s supply of affordable housing while preserving the public lands that are our true common ground.” – Dan Ritzman, Conservation Campaign Director,  Sierra Club

“People across the country have stood up time and time again to reject the sell-off of our public lands and the notion that they are simply a corporate asset on a balance sheet. Our public lands are our shared inheritance and our legacy. They are vital to sustaining our local economies, wildlife, and communities. Anyone suggesting we must sacrifice them to solve the housing crisis is offering a false choice. We need real, community-based housing solutions, and we need to keep public lands in public hands.”- Brien Webster, Senior Public Lands Campaign Manager, Conservation Colorado 

“Large-scale sell-off of public land is not the solution to the affordable housing crisis. In Wyoming, public lands strengthen our communities and are part of our way of life. We stand behind the idea that protecting public lands and addressing the affordability crisis need to be simultaneously prioritized by those in our nation’s leadership.” – Gabrielle Yates, Public Lands Program Manager, Wyoming Outdoor Council

“Our public lands are a part of our nation’s shared resources—offering unmatched opportunities to enjoy outdoor experiences, protect natural ecosystems, and bring tourism revenue to our towns. This administration and its industry allies are attempting to create a false choice between our spectacular public lands and affordable housing. SELC is proud to join in this broad coalition of organizations that reject the idea of an unnecessary conflict between those values and to stand in solidarity with both public lands protection and common sense housing reforms.” – Alyson R. Merlin, Staff Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center

“Addressing the real need for affordable housing in our communities and opposing ongoing efforts to sell off our federal public lands are both issues with broad and bipartisan support,” said Tom Uniack, Executive Director for Washington Wild. “Advocates for both of these important issues have found common ground that solutions for both can be achieved but not at the expense of the other.”

“Our nation’s public lands are largely remote, far from any infrastructure, often steep, and if human encroachment occurs in them, they are highly susceptible to fire. Rather than proposing housing which would inevitably be expensive and risky in the Wildland/Urban Interface, the principles we adopt here will lead to real affordable housing in the places where it belongs. The highest and best use of our public lands is as wildlife habitat, places for recreation and cultural experience, and as the engines that create clean water and air for all of us.”—Mark Green, Executive Director, CalWild.

“Our national public lands belong to all Americans, providing opportunities for recreation, preserving wildlife habitat, supplying clean water, and more. While affordable housing is a critical need, selling off our common heritage is not the answer. Cities and states need to look to infill development and appropriate local lands. Furthermore, simply increasing the housing supply is not enough; strategies must be employed to ensure that the housing built is actually affordable. There is no need to sacrifice our public lands to do this.”—Michael J. Painter, Coordinator, Californians for Western Wilderness

“Over 95% of Idahoans want public lands to stay in public hands. Proposals to sell off large tracts of public lands don’t meet affordable housing needs or public desires to protect open space. By encouraging infill and by building up – and not out – we are protecting the trailheads and trail systems that make Idaho communities great places to raise families. We are also creating opportunities for our kids and future generations to stay in Idaho and enjoy the same quality of life we do today.” – John Robison, Public Lands and Wildlife Director, Idaho Conservation League

 “While access to affordable housing should be one of the highest priorities in the US, it does not need to come at the cost of despoiling public lands.  We can balance the need to provide housing without causing irreparable harm to the environment for future generations.” – Michelle Taylor, Vice President of Social Health Services, Community Care Alliance 

Government agencies at the federal, state and local level often own land within urban boundaries. These properties can and should be considered for affordable housing, if not serving other needed functions. Urban properties usually have needed infrastructure like roads and utilities, and accessibility to community services such as jobs, schools, shopping and health care for future residents. However, public lands outside of urban areas should be preserved for wildlife, recreation, domestic drinking water resources, and climate mitigation. – Darlene Chirman, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Cascade Volcanoes Chapter

 ### 

The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is a nonprofit organization with members and supporters from around the country dedicated to protecting America’s redrock wilderness. From offices in Moab, Salt Lake City, and Washington, DC, our team of professionals defends the redrock, organizes support for America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act, and stewards a world-renowned landscape. Learn more at www.suwa.org. 

The post Unprecedented Alliance Highlights Need for Real Affordable Housing Solutions Without Sacrificing Public Lands – 4.29.26  appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Price field office is proposing to authorize aircraft takeoffs and landings in the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness by designating the unauthorized Keg Knoll backcountry airstrip as open for aircraft use. The airstrip is located on the west side of Labyrinth Canyon and north of Canyonlands National Park.

Please tell the BLM to protect the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness area by not authorizing aircraft use at the Keg Knoll backcountry airstrip.

The Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness was designated by Congress in 2019. While the Wilderness Act gives the BLM some discretion to allow (or prohibit) continued use at airstrips that were legally established prior to wilderness designation, it does not allow the agency to authorize aircraft use when the airstrip was not legally open prior to the wilderness designation. That’s the situation here.

The Price office’s 2008 management plan—the land use plan in effect when the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness was established—specifically lists five “existing and currently used backcountry airstrips” for continued noncommercial and limited commercial aviation use; Keg Knoll is not on the list. And for good reason, as it was unused and reclaiming at the time. The agency’s 1999 wilderness inventory of Labyrinth Canyon confirms as much, noting “abandoned airstrips” in the Keg Knoll area. The airstrip was also never identified on the legislative map that accompanied the 2019 bill designating the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness.

Click here to tell the BLM that aircraft use at Keg Knoll is unnecessary and unlawful.

Near the airstrip site in the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness. © Ray Bloxham/SUWA

Backcountry airstrips and aircraft use conflict with the reasons most people seek out wilderness in the first place: solitude, natural soundscapes, wildlife, and an experience of remoteness that often can’t be found on other public lands. What’s more, there are plenty of backcountry airstrips throughout Utah that don’t impact designated wilderness areas (only around 4% of BLM land in Utah is designated wilderness).

The BLM is preparing an environmental assessment (EA) and is intending to issue a decision in mid-May. At the Trump administration’s direction, the agency is not planning to release a draft EA to the public or hold a formal public comment period—so please submit your comments as soon as possible.

The Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness is a gem of the American West and should be managed for the benefit and enhancement of the wilderness values it was designated to protect. With your help, we can ensure that the BLM takes seriously its obligation to protect this world-class wilderness area.

Thank you for your support.

The post Tell BLM: No Active Airstrip in the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness! appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

Redrock Report: Earth Week Edition

Happy Earth Week! Here at SUWA we remain laser-focused on defending Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument from congressional attacks. But this week we’re also celebrating the power of our collective action, which is fueled by our love for this magnificent landscape.

Please continue to speak out for Utah’s wild places in any way you can, and if you live in Utah, see below for some local opportunities to support the Protect Wild Utah movement, celebrate Earth Day, and help shape a better future through civic engagement. Thanks for all you do!

Latest Updates on Grand Staircase-Escalante and the Congressional Review Act

Boundary Waters Suffers Major Blow, Grand Staircase-Escalante Could Be Next

 

First, the bad news. Last week, the U.S. Senate voted 50-49 to pass H.J. Res. 140, which overturns the 20-year mining ban in the headwaters of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in northern Minnesota, the most visited wilderness area in America. As you know, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument faces a similar threat (undoing of the monument management plan) using the same legislative tool: the Congressional Review Act (CRA). If this obscure law can be weaponized against public lands in Minnesota and Utah, it can happen anywhere in the country.

“Today is a tragic day for the Boundary Waters and all who care about stewarding public lands and wilderness,” said SUWA Executive Director Scott Braden in a recent press statement. “Using the Congressional Review Act to undo protections is a short-sighted mistake—whether it’s the Boundary Waters or Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Congress should stop attacking cherished public lands.”

Our work to protect Grand Staircase-Escalante is unwavering—and now with more clarity than ever before. You’ve heard us say this before and it remains true: SUWA has never backed down from a hard fight, and we’re not going to start now.

Photo © Dave Freeman

Outcry Grows Over Misuse of CRA

 

The good news is that there is widespread and growing opposition to use of the CRA against Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. We’ve seen statements, letters, and resolutions from the Grand Staircase-Escalante Inter-Tribal Coalition; the Navajo Utah Commission; local businesses; outdoor companies; faith leaders; the town of Boulder, UT; and more than 125 local, state, and national organizations (a compilation can be found here). Meanwhile, the Salt Lake Tribune, Grand Junction Sentinel, Idaho Statesman, and Durango Herald have all editorialized in support of the monument. 

Your Involvement Remains Critical

We know we’ve been asking a lot of you lately, but now is not the time to let up. If you’ve emailed or called your members of Congress, please encourage friends and family to do the same. Write or call again yourself, submit a letter to the editor, meet with your elected officials, view and share our Grand Staircase-Escalante StoryMap, or create artwork celebrating the monument and send it to loveforgse@suwa.org. No matter where you live, our Grassroots Organizing Team can help you find the most effective ways to take action. Click here to learn more.

Live in Utah? Get Involved Locally

 

Attend a Candidate Debate for Utah’s New 1st Congressional District

Utah’s elected officials at the federal Level—our senators and representatives—have the power to determine what happens on our treasured public lands. With new maps being used for U.S. House races this November, your vote in the congressional elections could matter more than ever. If you live in the new 1st District (which covers most, but not all, of Salt Lake County), we encourage you to join SUWA and our partners at Stewardship Utah for a 1st District Candidate Debate in Salt Lake City this Wednesday, April 22 (Earth Day) from 6:00 – 8:30 pm. Click here to learn more and RSVP.

Take Part in a Clean-Up Day on the Navajo Nation

Join us on Saturday, April 25 for a trash clean-up on the Navajo Nation! SUWA is partnering with C 4Ever Green to show care for the natural world this Earth Week. Meet us at the Red Mesa Chapter House (155 Red Mesa Rd #35, Montezuma Creek, Utah) at 8:30 am. We’ll spend the morning cleaning up and share a meal together in the afternoon. A group of us will be camping out in the Bluff area the night before. Email Mimi (mimi@suwa.org) or Nicole (nicole@suwa.org) for more information and to let us know you’re coming. Carpooling is encouraged.

Participate in the Earth Action Rally at the State Capitol

On Sunday, April 26, from 1:30 – 3:30 pm, Salt Lake Valley residents will gather on the Utah State Capitol steps for this year’s Earth Action Rally: Our Power, Our Planet. Local issues on this year’s agenda include air quality, the shrinking Great Salt Lake, nuclear energy, data centers, and more. Come listen to speakers, chat with local nonprofits, enjoy musical performances, and connect with your community to create change. 

Act Locally, Give Locally

 

This year, communities across Utah are coming together for UTAHGIVES—a 24-hour celebration of generosity that puts the spotlight on nonprofits doing the essential work that makes this state stronger. Across Utah, from Logan to Moab to St. George, people are supporting what they love and showing up for the places and organizations that matter to them. SUWA is proud to be part of this community event on Thursday, April 30!

Early giving is already open. From now through April 30, please visit our our UTAHGIVES page and make your gift. Then tell a friend! Every donation, whatever the size, is a direct investment in the Protect Wild Utah movement. Thank you!

The post April 2026 Redrock Report appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

April 16, 2026 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SUWA Statement on Passage of Legislation Attacking Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) – 4.16.26  Threat remains to Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 

Contacts:
Grant Stevens, Communications Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA); (319) 427-0260; grant@suwa.org

Washington, DC – Today, the U.S. Senate voted 50-49, passing H.J. Res. 140, which overturns the 20-year mining ban in the headwaters of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Northern Minnesota, the most visited wilderness area in America. Another iconic landscape – Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Southern Utah – faces a similar threat (undoing of the Monument Management Plan) using the same nefarious legislative tool: the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Below is a statement from SUWA Executive Director Scott Braden:  

“Today is a tragic day for the Boundary Waters and all who care about stewarding public lands and wilderness. Using the Congressional Review Act to undo protections is a short-sighted mistake – whether it’s the Boundary Waters or Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument,” said Scott Braden, Executive Director of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA). “Congress should stop attacking cherished public lands.” 

Additional information re: H.J. Res 140 and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness can be found here. There is widespread and growing opposition to this outrageous use of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to attack Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. A compilation can be found here.  

About Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument & the Monument Management Plan 

Since its establishment, heightened protections for the Monument’s geology, paleontology, wildlife, plant communities, and ancestral sites have succeeded in preserving these unique values for generations to come, and local communities on the Monument’s doorstep have benefited as well. Nearly 30 years later, the numerous benefits of protecting Grand Staircase-Escalante are clear: the Monument preserves a remarkable ecosystem at the landscape level and sets the stage for future discovery about human, paleontological, and geological history on the Colorado Plateau.  

On December 4, 2017, President Trump ignored millions of public comments and unlawfully eliminated large swaths of the Monument, slashing it by 47 percent – roughly 900,000 acres. Thankfully, on October 8, 2021, President Biden signed a proclamation restoring Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument to its full, original boundaries. In 2023, BLM began developing a new management plan for the full Monument. As a part of that work, the BLM engaged in extensive outreach to Tribal Nations, the State of Utah, local governments, stakeholders (including outfitters and guides, ranchers, local utilities), and the public. During the planning process, BLM received overwhelming support from throughout Utah and the nation for a holistic, conservation-based management plan worthy of this remarkable place. 

In August 2023, a Federal District Court Judge in Utah dismissed lawsuits brought by the state of Utah and others challenging President Biden’s use of the Antiquities Act to restore the boundaries of Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments. The state and other plaintiffs quickly appealed that decision to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held oral argument on September 26, 2024, and may issue a decision at any time. Conservation organizations intervened on behalf of the United States to defend President Biden’s restoration of the Monuments, as have four Tribal nations. 

National monuments are overwhelmingly popular. Seventy-five percent of Utah voters support the President’s ability to protect public lands as national monuments. Three in four Utah voters, including a majority of Republicans, want to keep Grand Staircase-Escalante as a national monument. 

About the Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

The CRA is a federal statute enacted in March 1996 that requires federal agencies to submit “rules” to Congress for a mandatory review period “before they may take effect.” If Congress votes to overturn, or “disapprove,” the rule, it “may not be reissued in substantially the same form. . . .” The BLM has long maintained that its land management plans are not “rules” subject to the CRA. Other federal land management agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service, have similarly not submitted their land management plans to Congress under the CRA. 

However, emboldened by a series of non-binding Government Accountability Office (GAO) opinions, Republican members of Congress have embraced the novel theory that federal land management plans are in fact “rules” subject to the CRA. This year, Congress has passed six CRA resolutions overturning previously finalized land management plans or other types of public lands management decisions.  The GAO issued an opinion regarding the Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument Management Plan on January 15, 2026. 

• While overturning the Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument management plan would not change the boundaries of the monument or alter President Biden’s proclamation establishing the monument, it is a serious threat with potential implications for all national monuments.  

• Monument management plans set expectations for how the land will be managed for wildlife, outdoor access, dark night skies, grazing, and other uses. The Utah delegation’s gambit threatens that certainty. Using the CRA to overturn the Grand Staircase-Escalante management plan disregards years of public input on how these lands are managed for the public, including hunters, hikers, scientists, ranchers, and others who hold permits to use public lands inside the monument. 

• Congress is ignoring Tribal Nations. Multiple Native American Tribes are connected to Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. The Grand Staircase-Escalante Inter-Tribal Coalition advocates for the conservation of their ancestral lands and for the continued protection and preservation of the cultural and environmental resources found within the monument. Tribes provide deeply valuable perspectives related to the management of Monument lands and cultural resources that tell the story of their peoples, and are integral to the history of the United States, and should be consulted before any changes are made to the Monument’s management plan. 

Additional Information 

• March 4, 2026 Press Release – Senator Lee, Rep. Maloy Introduce Joint Resolution to Undo Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan 

• February 26, 2026 Press Release – Senator Lee formally begins process to fast-track the destruction of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah  

• The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Inter-tribal Coalition who have spoken against using the CRA on the Monument Management Plan 

• Additional quotes can be found here. 

### 
The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is a nonprofit organization with members and supporters from around the country dedicated to protecting America’s redrock wilderness. From offices in Moab, Salt Lake City, and Washington, DC, our team of professionals defends the redrock, organizes support for America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act, and stewards a world-renowned landscape. Learn more at www.suwa.org 

 

 

The post SUWA Statement on Passage of Legislation Attacking Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Using the CRA – 4.16.26 appeared first on Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.